• fr
  • en

How Rural Development Programmes can contribute to stronger and more balance rural development?

Euromontana participated to a public hearing on “Rural Development Programmes: Process and Aspirations” organised by the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) on 13th April 2015. This first public hearing will be followed by two others (in Wales and Finland) before the preparation of an initiative opinion that is expected to be adopted in September 2015.

With this report, the EESC has questioned representatives of the civil society on the contribution of the Rural Development Programmes (RDP) to stronger and more balance rural development. In particular, it will focus on the consultation process (were stakeholders consulted in the elaboration of the RDP? In an efficient way?), on how to bring real benefit to citizens (focusing especially on entrepreneurship and the creation of jobs), on social justice and on sustainable development and environmental biodiversity.

Martin Scheele, from DG AGRI, tried to give a general overview of the measures adopted in the different RDP, knowing that so far only 18 programmes out of 118 have been officially approved. It seems that 43% of the funding will be spent on measures for ecosystems in agriculture and forestry, 20% for farm viability and competitiveness, 15% for promotion of social inclusion, poverty reduction and local development, 10% for food chain, animal welfare and risk management and finally 9% for resources efficiency, low carbon and climate resilience.

Representatives from Germany, Spain and Latvia explained how the consultation process was conducted in their respective countries and the multifunction role of agriculture in these RDP. Their presentations will soon be available here.

In the opening debate, Euromontana took the opportunity to ask about the sub-thematic programmes. Indeed, some very interesting measures have been created at EU level, such as the possibility to have sub-thematic programmes for mountain areas. Unfortunately, so far, it seems that the different regions and Member States have not seized this opportunity to put more focus on mountain farming. Thus, Euromontana reminded the EESC that the novelties developed at EU level should also be brought back to the ground level and explained to the different stakeholders, not only to the Managing Authorities, otherwise, there is a risk that they won’t be applied.

Share
20 April 2015

Euromontana sur Facebook

Unable to display Facebook posts.
Show error

Error: (#10) This endpoint requires the 'manage_pages' permission or the 'Page Public Content Access' feature. Refer to https://developers.facebook.com/docs/apps/review/login-permissions#manage-pages and https://developers.facebook.com/docs/apps/review/feature#reference-PAGES_ACCESS for details.
Type: OAuthException
Code: 10
Please refer to our Error Message Reference.

Euromontana sur Twitter

Active participation is key for better regulation
Have your say for the renewal of the #TerritorialAgenda. Take a few minutes to give your feedback and ideas on how to improve this document that is important for the European #Regions and #cities
https://t.co/6U4BtRmoM9

The mountains are calling you! Contact us with your news, so we can spread the word that #MountainsMatter

Rural Europe: which way to go ? @jwojc @CiolosDacian @EricAndrieuEU les zones rurales sont facteur d'équilibre et de solutions pour la société @Euromontana

#ruralareas are on the top of the agenda tonight at the #EuropeanParliament with top decision-makers agreeing that we need to invest in rural future. "We have a new story to write for our rural areas, so they are part of the future of Europe" said @CiolosDacian in his opening.

Tonight MEPs and Commissioner @jwojc discuss perspectives for European #ruralareas. A common call for more synergies between the #CAP and cohesion policy, more investments in rural areas and a holistic & long term approach for the development of our territories

Load More...